The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has informed the Allahabad High Court that the Jama Masjid in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh, is in a state of good preservation and does not require immediate repainting. However, the ASI has raised serious concerns regarding unauthorized repair work that has significantly altered the historic structure, potentially compromising its original architectural integrity.
The matter came before the court in connection with a petition seeking directions for the preservation and maintenance of the historic mosque. The petition had highlighted the need for repainting and other restoration measures. In response, the ASI submitted a detailed report, outlining the current condition of the mosque and its findings regarding the recent repair work.
ASI’s Assessment of the Mosque’s Condition:
According to the ASI’s report, the Jama Masjid, a protected monument of national importance, is structurally sound. The report emphasized that the existing plaster and paint layers are in a satisfactory state, negating the necessity for an immediate repainting exercise. The ASI’s assessment was based on detailed inspections conducted by its experts, who evaluated the structural stability, material condition, and overall preservation of the mosque.
The ASI’s stance is that any restoration or repainting work on a protected monument must be carried out with meticulous care and adherence to established conservation principles. Unnecessary interventions can often lead to irreversible damage, particularly to historical materials and architectural features.
Concerns Over Unauthorized Repairs:
The primary focus of the ASI’s report was the unauthorized repair work that has been carried out on the mosque. The ASI stated that these repairs, undertaken without its permission or oversight, have resulted in significant alterations to the original fabric of the structure.
Specifically, the ASI pointed to the use of modern materials and techniques that are incompatible with the historic character of the mosque. This includes the application of cement plaster and modern paints, which can trap moisture and lead to the deterioration of the original lime mortar and brickwork. The unauthorized repairs also included modifications to the flooring and other architectural elements, which have compromised the authenticity and historical significance of the monument.
The ASI’s report highlighted the importance of preserving the original materials and construction techniques used in historic structures. It emphasized that any repair or restoration work must be carried out in a manner that respects the historical integrity of the monument and avoids the introduction of incompatible materials or techniques.
Legal Implications and Future Actions:
The ASI’s report has significant legal implications for the future of the Jama Masjid. The Allahabad High Court is now tasked with considering the ASI’s findings and issuing appropriate directions for the preservation and maintenance of the mosque.
The court is likely to take a stern view of the unauthorized repair work and may order the removal of the incompatible materials and the restoration of the original architectural features. The court may also direct the ASI to conduct a comprehensive conservation plan for the mosque, outlining the necessary steps for its long-term preservation.
The ASI is expected to take legal action against those responsible for the unauthorized repairs, as such actions violate the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. This act provides for the protection of ancient monuments and archaeological sites and prohibits unauthorized alterations or repairs.
The court’s decision will be a crucial precedent for the protection of other protected monuments in India. It will send a strong message that unauthorized interventions in historic structures will not be tolerated and that the preservation of our cultural heritage is a matter of paramount importance.
Community Engagement and Awareness:
The Jama Masjid in Sambhal is not only a protected monument but also a place of worship for the local community. The preservation of the mosque requires the active participation and cooperation of the community.
The ASI is likely to engage with the local community to raise awareness about the importance of preserving the mosque’s historical integrity and to ensure that any future repair or restoration work is carried out in accordance with established conservation principles.
The case also underscores the need for greater public awareness about the significance of protected monuments and the importance of adhering to the laws and regulations that govern their preservation. By fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility among the public, we can ensure that our cultural heritage is preserved for future generations.
The Allahabad High Court’s ruling on this matter will be closely watched by heritage enthusiasts, conservationists, and the general public, as it will set a precedent for the protection of India’s rich cultural heritage.
